Reference
John Letcher (Congressional Biographical Directory)
"Letcher, John," Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, 1774 to Present, http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=L000256.
LETCHER, John, a Representative from Virginia; born in Lexington, Rockbridge County, Va., March 29, 1813; attended private rural schools and Randolph-Macon College; was graduated from Washington Academy (now Washington and Lee University), Lexington, Va., in 1833; studied law; was admitted to the bar and commenced practice in Lexington, Va., in 1839; editor of the Valley Star from 1840 to 1850; delegate to the State constitutional convention in 1850; elected as a Democrat to the Thirty-second and to the three succeeding Congresses (March 4, 1851-March 3, 1859); was not a
George Henry Williams, Radical Republican (American National Biography)
Scholarship
Leonard Schlup, "Williams, George Henry," American National Biography Online, February 2000, http://www.anb.org/articles/05/05-00959.html.
Becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the Democratic party during the course of the Civil War and pleased with the policies of President Abraham Lincoln, Williams joined the Republican party in 1864. That year the Oregon state legislature elected him as a Republican to the U.S. Senate, where he served from 1865 to 1871.... Williams supported the Radical Republicans, including Representative Thaddeus Stevens of Pennsylvania, in attempts to impose a strict policy of Reconstruction on the vanquished South.
George Henry Williams, Slavery (American National Biography)
Scholarship
Leonard Schlup, "Williams, George Henry," American National Biography Online, February 2000, http://www.anb.org/articles/05/05-00959.html.
In 1853, upon the recommendation of Senator Stephen A. Douglas of Illinois, President [Franklin] Pierce appointed Williams chief justice of the territorial courts of Oregon, where Williams remained until 1857. One of his controversial decisions involved a free African American, Robin Holmes, who had sued his former owner, Nathaniel Ford, to obtain legal custody of his children. Williams, who opposed the extension of slavery into Oregon, ruled in favor of Holmes.
Washington County, OR
clear_left
On
Place Unit Type
County
clear_tab_people
On
clear_tab_images
On
Clackamas County, OR
clear_left
On
Place Unit Type
County
clear_tab_people
On
clear_tab_images
On
Multnomah County, OR
clear_left
On
Place Unit Type
County
clear_tab_people
On
clear_tab_images
On
Portland, OR
clear_left
On
Place Unit Type
City or Town
clear_tab_people
On
Location
clear_tab_images
On
George Henry Williams (Congressional Biographical Directory)
Reference
"Williams, George Henry," Biographical Directory of the United States Congress, 1774 to Present, http://bioguide.congress.gov/scripts/biodisplay.pl?index=W000498.
WILLIAMS, George Henry, a Senator from Oregon; born in New Lebanon, Columbia County, N.Y., March 26, 1823; completed preparatory studies; studied law; admitted to the bar in 1844 and commenced practice at Fort Madison, Iowa Territory; judge of the first judicial district of Iowa 1847-1852; presidential elector on the Democratic ticket in 1852; chief justice of the Territory of Oregon 1853-1857; reappointed by President James Buchanan but declined; member of the State constitutional convention of Oregon in 1858; elected as a Republican to the United States Senate and serve
One Flag, One Land
Type: Description
Citation:
Richard C. Brown and Herbert J. Bass, One Flag, One Land, vol. 1 (Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett Company, 1986), 468-469.
Body Summary:
Men favoring slavery formed one territorial government in Kansas. Men opposed to slavery formed another. Raids and murders took place as law and order broke down. John Brown, a fanatical abolitionist, and his sons led an attack in which five proslavery settlers in Kansas were killed. Violence in "bleeding Kansas" added to the tensions now being felt in all parts of the country.
Type: Description
Citation:
Richard C. Brown and Herbert J. Bass, One Flag, One Land, vol. 1 (Morristown, NJ: Silver Burdett Company, 1986), 464.
Body Summary:
For black people it was no compromise. It was a disaster. What did it matter if the slave sales were forbidden in the District of Columbia? White families living there could still keep slaves. And Southern officeholders could bring slaves to serve them in the capital city of a supposedly free, democratic nation. But the chief threat for black people came from passing of the Fugitive Slave Law, one part of the Compromise of 1850...Finally, the law said that those who knew of escaped slaves and did not report what they knew could be fined and even jailed.
The National Experience: A History of the United States
Type: Description
Citation:
John M. Blum, et al., eds., The National Experience: A History of the United States (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1963), 309-310.
Body Summary:
The antagonists in Kansas acted. The roving Missourians who kept crossing the line carried weapons to back up their arguments. New England abolitionists shipped boxes of rifles, "Beecher's Bibles," to the antislavery settlers. (An eminent antislavery clergyman, Henry Ward Beecher, had incautiously remarked that a rifle might be a more powerful moral agent on the Kansas plains than a Bible.) Sporadic shootings and barn-burnings culminated, in May 1856, in a raid by Missouri "border ruffians" on the free-soil town of Lawrence. They sacked the place, destroyed the type and press of an antislavery newspaper and terrorized the inhabitants. A few days later john Brown, a grim abolitionist fanatic, retaliated. He and his ons and companions undertook a foray through the valley of Potawattomie Creek, where they stole horses, murdered five settlers, and mutilated their bodies. Brown claimed that he was an agent of the Lord, assigned to punish those who favored slavery. His inexcusable atrocities, lamentable by any reasonable standard, spurred a counterattack by proslavery men, who fell upon Brown's band, killed one of his sons, and burned the settlement at Osawatomie. Though federal troops prevented further private war, the slavery issue had brought blood and terror to Kansas.
Type: Description
Citation:
John M. Blum, et al., eds., The National Experience: A History of the United States (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1963), 309.
Body Summary:
The first governor of the territory, Andrew H. Reeder, a Pennsylvania Democrat, found that several thousand settlers had preceded him to Kansas. In the fall of 1854 he called an election to choose a territorial delegate to Congress, and early in 1855 he called another election to name a territorial legislature. But Kansas elections developed unusual features. The Missouri counties which bordered Kansas on the east were strong proslavery areas, and the people in these counties, urged on by leaders like Senator Atchison, did not want a free-soil territory next door. Missourians by the hundreds swarmed across the border to Kansas to vote in the territorial elections. The antislavery settlers, though apparently in the majority, were heavily out-voted. On the face of the returns, the new territory had chosen a proslavery delegate to Congress and had elected a solidly proslavery legislature. The legislature, in turn, at once adopted a stringent slave code, providing the death sentence for anyone who helped a fugitive slave to escape and a prison term for anyone who held that slavery was not legal in Kansas.
Type: Description
Citation:
John M. Blum, et al. eds., The National Experience: A History of the United States (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1963), 268-69.
Body Summary:
But the Democratic convention, where expansionist sentiment was stronger, denied Van Buren the nomination he coveted. Instead, the delegates chose James K. Polk of Tennessee, whose commitment to territorial expansion was clear and unqualified. To avoid the accusation of sectional favoritism, the Democratic platform cleverly united a demand for the admission of Texas with a demand for the acquisition “of the whole of the Territory of Oregon.” The platform also made the dubious assertion that the United States had a clear title to both. It followed, therefore, “that the re-occupation of Oregon and the re-annexation of Texas at the earliest practicable period are great American measures, which this convention recommends to the cordial support of the Democracy of the Union.” By combining the expansionist desires of South and West, the Democrats had found a winning formula. Throughout the campaign Manifest Destiny transcended all other issues, so much so that Clay began to shift his position on Texas. He would favor annexation after all if it could be accomplished without war and upon “just and fair terms.” But this commitment still sounded halfhearted when compared with the spread-eagle oratory and aggressive slogans of the Democrats.
Type: Description
Citation:
John M. Blum, et al. eds., The National Experience: A History of the United States (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc., 1963), 283.
Body Summary:
In the Northern strongholds of anitslavey sentiment the new law simply could not be enforced; during the 1850s abolitionists executed a series of dramatic rescues of fugitives and sent them on to Canada and freedom. Moreover, various Northern states passed personal liberty laws which nullified the fugitive slave act or at least interfered with its enforcement. This was an assertation of state rights and a form of nullificaton that Southerners scarcely appreciated.